Critical Film Condition

Because there’s a movie for every situation.

Review: “Angels & Demons”

Posted by kristie On May - 14 - 2009

Ironically lacking soul.

It is a dicey endeavor to create suspense when a presumed 80% of your audience already know how it is going to end. Fortunately there are some alterations that were made from the book version, which I am obviously not going to reveal, but anyone who read the page-turner has a pretty good idea what is going to happen. James Cameron managed to catch me off guard when the Titanic finally sank, but that is another ballpark or in this case, universe.
And the universe is where the dichotomy of this movie cleverly hides. There is the fight for universal copyright (who created what?) and the hunt for salvation from a deadly detonation. Now that I am writing this it might just boil down to the same thing. Could Dan Brown actually be on to something here?

szenenbild_10jpeg_700x466 These are truly interesting questions that were not explored to the fullest of their potential, which would be truly Sisyphean. But that is really Captain Subtext talking or Father Subtext in this case. The Dan Brown trademark symbology scavenger hunt is what dictates the pace of the movie, openly cloaked in some Indiana Jones style church-bashing. Shoot first, ask questions later. And then pray for forgiveness
Everything else is philosophy.
The writers David Koepp and Akiva Goldsman certainly distilled the necessary ingredients for this to work (for anybody) but the movie in itself is not allowing you even to catch your breath and think about them.

It starts with a lesson in Vatican etiquette and a trip to CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research), where antimatter is created and then stolen. The two are linked. For the un-initiated: Antimatter is a powerful substance, somewhat like a tiny atom bomb that could be hazardous to millions of people in the hands of the wrong people. Speaking of the wrong people: The Holy See is threatened whilst vacant. The Swiss Guard and a beautiful Doctor lady get involved. And Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) finds himself trying to prevent a terrorist act against the Vatican, helping his old enemies trying to fight their old enemies.

szenenbild_08jpeg_700x481What then follows is a breathless race where Robert Landgon tries to find the Illuminati (I won’t ruin the mystery by explaining who they are). There are clues all over Rome at strategically touristy places, which have to be found before the Vatican is annihilated during the Conclave (meeting of the College of Cardinals convened to elect the pope). Robert Langdon seems to be the only person who knows everything about the Vatican and with a little help from upstairs (way, way upstairs) he finds the signs and treads on the “path of light”. Ironically this focus on the hunt results in a lack of life and soul for the movie. It is just clue after clue.

The crew ran into a lot of problems when the Vatican revoked all permits to shoot even in the vicinity of Vatican City. I can just hear a prop guy say: “So you want me to build a replica of St. Peter’s Square?”
Unfortunately it shows. Ron Howard is a good director, but in some scenes it is just too obvious that there were problems during the shoot. Clearly everyone knows what they were doing and this could have been a catastrophe, which it is not. It is entertaining, but left me breathless for the wrong reasons. There are some great mano-a-mano discussions and action and when the story diverted from the original, it became fascinating.

There is a great international cast including Ewan McGregor as Camerlengo Patrick McKenna, Stellan Skarsgård as Commander Richter, Armin Mueller-Stahl as Cardinal Strauss. And Ayelet Zurer as Vittoria Vetra, that’s Dr. Vetra. Sadly she is just a scientist appendage in heels running behind Tom Hanks.

Sometimes you just have to listen to your soul, not the marketing department.
Let’s not make this more than it is. But if you can get free publicity from the Vatican you have my blessing.

angels_and_demons_ver2

Popularity: 12%

O.o.m.A.: The Vatican and “Angels & Demons”

Posted by kristie On March - 25 - 2009

I confess. I love church-bashing. Always have.

So naturally I am inclined to enjoy anything that makes the Vatican look bad. Like Dan Brown for example.

Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) is back to solve a murder and prevent a terrorist act against the Vatican.

At the center of this prequel to “The Da Vinci Code” (2006) seems to be something of a chicken and egg problem. The age-old struggle between science versus faith/theology/religion. In this featurette, director Ron Howard, Tom Hanks and Ewan McGregor discuss the nature of the controversy: who can claim creation? Science or the Vatican?

The Vatican’s official newspaper, Avvenire, ran a story last week saying the Roman Catholic Church “cannot approve” of such a film. Well, the boycott of “The Da Vinci Code” cannot be counted a success. 760 Million Dollars and counting. And even though the Vatican banned the production from filming in St. Peter’s Square or anywhere else in the Vatican for that matter, it is likely that the negative press will only enhance ticket sales. Like Madonna said: “No Publicity is bad publicity”.

The movie also features Israelian acress Ayelet Zurer (Vittoria Vetra), Stellan Skarsgård (Richter) and Armin Mueller-Stahl (Straus).

Guddy’s take:

Well, considering that this boycott comes from the same group of people who say that condoms are bad in a time where two thirds of the world population is starving and 99% of it is horny, I think it’s bullshit. Plus, it only adds to the hype… Due to this boycott, more people are gonna watch this movie, and judging from the last trailer, I’ll be there for sure.

Popularity: 3%

Review: “The International”

Posted by kristie On March - 16 - 2009

international

[xrr rating=8/10 label=Directing]
[xrr rating=8/10 label=Screenwriting]
[xrr rating=10/10 label=Photography]
[xrr rating=8/10 label=Editing]
[xrr rating=7/10 label=Effects]
[xrr rating=10/10 label=Sound]
[xrr rating=7/10 label=Acting]
[xrr rating=9/10 label=Music/Score]
[xrr rating=7/10 label=Coolness]
[xrr rating=7/10 label=Brainness]
[xrr rating=6/10 label=Funness]
[xrr rating=7/10 label=Overall]

Jason Bourne meets Michael Clayton. Sort of.

In “The International”, Interpol Agent Louis Salinger (Clive Owen) and Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Eleanor Whitman (Naomi Watts) are determined to bring to justice one of the world’s most powerful banks. Salinger and Whitman’s investigation takes them from Berlin to Milan to New York and to Istanbul. Finding themselves in a high-stakes chase across the globe, their relentless tenacity puts their own lives at risk, as the bank will stop at nothing – even murder – to continue financing terror and war.

It is a little ironic that this movie deals with a financial institution’s power display and illegal activities including money laundering, arms trading and the destabilization of governments in the midst of a worldwide economic crisis. Banks just cannot get a good rep these days, can they?

Director Tom Tykwer delivers a movie that has brains – it is logical and not totally predictable. Thank you!!! The photography is immaculate, the sound is outstanding, the acting is good and I also have to mention the inventive location scouting. It’s like a mini vacation.

“The International” also features a great score composed by none other than Tykwer (and not for the first time!) along with Reinhold Heil and Johnny Klimek (they also composed for “Run Lola Run” and “Winterschläfer”).

However the mixture of Michael Clayton and Jason Bourne could have made a better cocktail. This is a very sober movie and Clive Owens is nevertheless made for this role. Guts, but no glory. Armin Mueller-Stahl is exceptional as the old East German relic Wilhelm Wexler.

However, the most convincing argument for this movie is the shootout in Frank Lloyd Wright’s Guggenheim Museum. It is awesome (and I don’t use this word lightly!). For anyone even remotely interested in art, the sight of the interior of Wright’s creation, shaped like the top of a honey dripper, being blown to bits is nerve-cringing and electrifying.

Worth the ticket or rental!

Popularity: 5%